| E S T O N I A N T O U R N A M E N T B R I D G E L E A G U E | |||||||
| G R A N D P R I X F I N A L T O U R N A M E N T 2 0 1 6 | CLICK RESULTS - FINAL "A" | ||||||
| S U M M A R Y A F T E R R O U N D N R . 2 5 | |||||||
| G E N E R A T E D : 2 0 . 1 1 . 2 0 1 6 1 5 : 5 3 : 2 5 | |||||||
| PRODUCED BY VAMBOLA KASE - BRIDGE CALCULATIONS PROGRAM | |||||||
| F I N A L " A " | |||||||
| 1. | 59,97% | 13 | Maripuu, Jaanus | Oja, Olavi | ROUND | ||
| 2. | 55,40% | 6 | Maastik, Mart | Strandberg, Jaak | 1 | C | |
| 3. | 54,54% | 8 | Vähk, Tõnno | Nõu, Kalvi | 2 | L | |
| 4. | 53,79% | 1 | Joonsaar, Jüri | Võhandu, Priit | 3 | I | |
| 5. | 53,74% | 10 | Oras, Maarja | Taube, Aire | 4 | C | |
| 6. | 52,22% | 16 | Alfejeva, Jelena | Vahe, Vilmar | 5 | K | |
| 7. | 51,64% | 15 | Linnamägi, Hannes | Kõivupuu, Tanel | 6 | ||
| 8. | 51,42% | 11 | Karpov, Maksim | Antonkov, Oleg | 7 | T | |
| 9. | 51,41% | 22 | Naber, Lauri | Luks, Leo | 8 | H | |
| 10. | 51,36% | 25 | Kalma, Ivar | Rummel, Aarne | 9 | E | |
| 11. | 50,96% | 12 | Kukemilk, Toomas | Lehesalu, Agu | 10 | ||
| 12. | 50,95% | 21 | Sirotin, Oleg | Tenn, Marko | 11 | N | |
| 13. | 50,80% | 14 | Nigul, Hendrik | Iher, Mirjam | 12 | U | |
| 14. | 50,52% | 2 | Uibu, Madis | Lume, Leo | 13 | M | |
| 15. | 50,37% | 20 | Aava, Jüri | Kurig, Vahur | 14 | B | |
| 16. | 50,21% | 7 | Uljanovs, Dainis | Romanovskis, Janis | 15 | E | |
| 17. | 50,14% | 9 | Mirme, Mikk | Aasmäe, Joel | 16 | R | |
| 18. | 48,76% | 23 | Maasik, Martin | Lember, Manglus | 17 | ||
| 19. | 47,19% | 4 | Kalma, Kalev | Tamme, Hannes | 18 | O | |
| 20. | 47,08% | 24 | Maalder, Enn | Jakobson, Tiit | 19 | F | |
| 21. | 46,90% | 5 | Kuusk, Andres | Piibor, Johanna | 20 | ||
| 22. | 46,45% | 26 | Jullis, Toivo | Pleksepp, Tõnis | 21 | R | |
| 23. | 45,73% | 3 | Vain, Urmas | Tekko, Jaanus | 22 | O | |
| 24. | 45,43% | 18 | Zvorovski, Rao | Piibeleht, Tiit Hendrik | 23 | U | |
| 25. | 43,78% | 17 | Vasar, Martin | Laan, Susanna | 24 | N | |
| 26. | 39,25% | 19 | Ojassalu, Kalle | Pari, Mait | 25 | D | |